Champ Program Child Abuse Medical Provider Program Education for Child Abuse Medical Providers, CHAMP Program, www.champprogram.comHome CHAMPMember AreaCourseworkSkip navigation, go to content directlybackground
spacer
CHAMP Home Page
Whats New
About us
CHAMP Mentors and Faculty
CHAMP Network Members
Webcasts
Caring with Compassion
Child Victims of Human Trafficking
Test Your Knowledge
Coursework
Practice Recommendations
Resources for Professionals
DOH Initiatives
Educational Resources for Medical Residents
Position Statement
Contact Us
 

Back to list of cases


Child Abuse Case 14


A 4-month-old infant presents to the Emergency Department with a fractured left humerus. The skeletal survey reveals the additional finding demonstrated in this radiograph. There is no history of previous injury, the child has had good mobility of his extremities prior this and the birth history indicates a normal delivery.


Case 14


Which of the following is a true statement regarding this injury?

  1. This is a classic metaphyseal lesion and it is suspicious for trauma.
  2. This finding of unilateral subperiosteal new bone formation is a normal finding.
  3. This is a normal finding associated with subperiosteal new bone formation.
  4. A nuclear bone scan should be performed to best demonstrate this finding.

line

The answer is A.

The chondro-osseus junction is a weak part of the bone during infancy and shearing forces disrupt the immature areas and not the adjacent cartilaginous physis. This AP view demonstrates the typical "bucket handle" fracture of the proximal metaphysis of the left tibia. The injury generally requires shearing forces not produced in accidental trauma. The injury can be produced when limbs flail during shaking. Other mechanisms of trauma to consider include twisting, jerking or pulling mechanisms. This infant had no history of prior injury and no explanation for this injury. The finding is suspicious for child abuse.

It is unusual to see subperiosteal new bone formation with a classic metaphyseal lesion (CML). This makes it difficult to estimate the time frame in which the fracture may have occurred. In this radiograph, there is a finding of new bone formation evident near the CML. This suggests healing that is likely 7–10 days in progress. Although this range is just an estimate, this further adds to the suspicion of abuse because it is an "older" fracture in combination with an acute fracture of the humerus.

The presence of solely subperiosteal new bone formation, even just unilateral new bone formation without a metaphyseal fracture, could be normal in an infant. However, this infant has a metaphyseal lesion and this is not normal.

A bone scan should not be used to diagnose a classic metaphyseal lesion. The metaphyseal area normally has high bone turnover, and therefore, is an expected hot spot for tracer absorption.


Back to list of cases








line

Copyright 2006-2021 The CHAMP Program, Syracuse, New York. All Rights Reserved.
www.CHAMPprogram.com
champ@upstate.edu
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York